CALUMET GRAIN & ELEVATOR CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 188 U.S. 431 (1903)

U.S. Supreme Court

CALUMET GRAIN & ELEVATOR CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 188 U.S. 431 (1903)

188 U.S. 431

CALUMET GRAIN & ELEVATOR COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 135.
 
Submitted December 19, 1902.
Decided February 23, 1903.

Messrs. Warren B. Wilson and S. A. Lynde for appellant.

Messrs. Charles M. Walker and Henry Schofield for appellee.

Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

This case relates to the construction of a dock in Calumet river, on or in front of land belonging to the appellant. The facts upon which that company principally bases its claims for relief are those upon which the plaintiffs relied in Cummings v. Chicago, just decided. 187 U. S. --, ante, 472, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 472. Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.[ Calumet Grain & Elevator Co v. City of Chicago 188 U.S. 431 (1903) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

CALUMET GRAIN & ELEVATOR CO v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 188 U.S. 431 (1903)

 188 U.S. 431

CALUMET GRAIN & ELEVATOR COMPANY, Appt.,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO.
No. 135.
 
Submitted December 19, 1902.
Decided February 23, 1903.

Messrs. Warren B. Wilson and S. A. Lynde for appellant.

Messrs. Charles M. Walker and Henry Schofield for appellee.

Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court:

This case relates to the construction of a dock in Calumet river, on or in front of land belonging to the appellant. The facts upon which that company principally bases its claims for relief are those upon which the plaintiffs relied in Cummings v. Chicago, just decided. 187 U. S. --, ante, 472, 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 472. Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.[ Calumet Grain & Elevator Co v. City of Chicago 188 U.S. 431 (1903) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.