VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 149 U.S. 648 (1893)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 149 U.S. 648 (1893)149 U.S. 648
VINCENT
v.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1,316.
May 15, 1893.
W. H. H. Hart, Atty. Gen. Cal., for the motion.
Carroll Cook and G. R. B. Hayes, opposed.
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
This case, which will be found reported in 95 Cal. 425, 30
Pac. Rep. 581, differs in no essential respect from that of
McNulty, just considered. 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 959. For the reasons
given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be
dismissed.
Opinions
v.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1,316. May 15, 1893. Page 149 U.S. 648, 649 W. H. H. Hart, Atty. Gen. Cal., for the motion. Carroll Cook and G. R. B. Hayes, opposed. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER. This case, which will be found reported in 95 Cal. 425, 30 Pac. Rep. 581, differs in no essential respect from that of McNulty, just considered. 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 959. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
VINCENT v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 149 U.S. 648 (1893) 149 U.S. 648 VINCENTv.
PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1,316. May 15, 1893. Page 149 U.S. 648, 649 W. H. H. Hart, Atty. Gen. Cal., for the motion. Carroll Cook and G. R. B. Hayes, opposed. Mr. Chief Justice FULLER. This case, which will be found reported in 95 Cal. 425, 30 Pac. Rep. 581, differs in no essential respect from that of McNulty, just considered. 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 959. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the writ of error must be dismissed.
Search This Case
