140 U.S. 48 (1891)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Supreme Court

STEVENSON v. BARBOUR, 140 U.S. 48 (1891)

140 U.S. 48


April 20, 1891

J. G. Carlisle, for plaintiff in error.

O. B. Hallam, for defendantin error.


No assignment of errors accompanies the transcript of record in this case, nor is there any specification of the errors relied on in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error. Moreover, the record presents no question of law calling for the exercise of our right of review. Fishburn v. Railway Co., 137 U.S. 60, ante, 8; Express Co. v. Malin, 132 U.S. 531, 538, 10 S. Sup. Ct. Rep. 166. The judgment is affirmed.[ Stevenson v. Barbour 140 U.S. 48 (1891) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.