WALKER v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, 127 U.S. 699 (1888)
U.S. Supreme Court
WALKER v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, 127 U.S. 699 (1888)
127 U.S. 699
WALKER et al.
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. [Footnote 1]
April 9, 1888
D. T. Watson, for plaintiffs in error.
Wayne MacVeagh and W. S. Kirkpatrick, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
HARLAN, J.
The questions presented in this case do not differ, in any material respect, from those determined in Powell v. Com., ante, 992, (just decided .) The principles announced in that case necessarily require an affirmance of the judgment below. It is so ordered.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 Affirming 11 Atl. Rep. 623.[ Walker v. Com. of Pennsylvania 127 U.S. 699 (1888) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
WALKER v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, 127 U.S. 699 (1888)
WALKER et al.
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. [Footnote 1]
April 9, 1888
D. T. Watson, for plaintiffs in error.
Wayne MacVeagh and W. S. Kirkpatrick, Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.
HARLAN, J.
The questions presented in this case do not differ, in any material respect, from those determined in Powell v. Com., ante, 992, (just decided .) The principles announced in that case necessarily require an affirmance of the judgment below. It is so ordered.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 Affirming 11 Atl. Rep. 623.[ Walker v. Com. of Pennsylvania 127 U.S. 699 (1888) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.