Addington v. Burke, 125 U.S. 693 (1887)

U.S. Supreme Court

Addington v. Burke, 125 U.S. 693 (1887)

Addington v. Burke

No. 3

Submitted October 13, 1887

Decided October 17, 1887

125 U.S. 693

Syllabus

The parties having compromised the suit and stipulated that the plaintiff in error shall dismiss it, the Court makes an order to enforce the stipulation unless cause to the contrary be shown.

The case is stated in the opinion.

U.S. Supreme Court

Addington v. Burke, 125 U.S. 693 (1887)

Addington v. Burke

No. 3

Submitted October 13, 1887

Decided October 17, 1887

125 U.S. 693

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Syllabus

The parties having compromised the suit and stipulated that the plaintiff in error shall dismiss it, the Court makes an order to enforce the stipulation unless cause to the contrary be shown.

The case is stated in the opinion.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

It having been suggested that this cause has been compromised, and the debt paid, and that a stipulation has been entered into by the parties to the effect that the plaintiffs in error shall dismiss the suit,

It is ordered that unless the plaintiffs in error show cause to the contrary on or before the fourth Monday in November, the writ be dismissed.

The clerk will serve a copy of this order at once on the counsel for the plaintiffs in error of record through the mail.

This order having been duly served, and return thereof made, on the 5th of December, 1887, MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE announced the following order:

This cause is dismissed under the order made October 17, 1887, no cause having been shown to the contrary, as then required.

The clerk will preserve as part of the record the evidence of service of the order of October 17th.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.