HOPE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PROVIDENCE V. BOARDMAN, 9 U. S. 57 (1809)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 9 U. S. 57
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/9/57/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/9/57/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Hope Insurance Company of Providence v. Boardman, 9 U.S. 5 Cranch 57 57 (1809)
Hope Insurance Company of Providence v. Boardman
9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 57
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Syllabus
A corporation aggregate cannot be citizen and cannot litigate in the courts of the United States unless in consequence of the character of the individuals who compose the body politic, which character must appear by proper averments upon the record.
Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, in an action upon a policy of insurance.
The only question decided in this Court was that relative to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States.
The parties were described in the declaration as follows:
"William Henderson Boardman and Pascal Paoli Pope, both of Boston, in the District of Massachusetts, merchants and citizens of the State of Massachusetts, complain of The Hope Insurance Company of Providence, a company legally incorporated by the Legislature of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations and established at Providence in said district. "
The question of jurisdiction was not made in the court below.
The Court having, in the case of Bank of the United States v. Deveaux, 9 U. S. 61, decided that the right of a corporation to litigate in the courts of the United States depended upon the character (as to citizenship) of the members which compose the body corporate, and that a body corporate as such cannot be a citizen within the meaning of the Constitution, reversed the judgment for want of jurisdiction in the court below.