Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/69/134/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/69/134/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Ex Parte Dugan, 69 U.S. 2 Wall. 134 134 (1864)
Ex Parte Dugan
69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 134
Syllabus
On a mere petition for a certiorari, the court, according to its better and more regular practice, will decline to hear the case on its merits even though the counsel for the petitioner produce a copy of the record admitted on the other side to be a true one. It will wait for a return, in form, from the court below.
On a petition for a certiorari to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to send up the record of their proceedings upon a habeas corpus issued from that court upon the application of the petitioner, it was stated by Mr. J. H. Bradley, counsel of the petitioner, that a copy of the record had been obtained, and he asked this Court, upon the admission of the Attorney General that the copy was a correct one, to hear the case without a return from the court below. The Attorney General, on the other hand, while admitting the copy of the record produced to be correct, moved the Court, for reasons which he laid, to continue the case.
