Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/57/251/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/57/251/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Maillard v. Lawrence, 57 U.S. 16 How. 251 251 (1853)
Maillard v. Lawrence
57 U.S. (16 How.) 251
Syllabus
By the Tariff Act of 1846, a duty of thirty percent ad valorem is imposed upon articles included within schedule C, amongst which are
"clothing ready made and wearing apparel of every description, of whatever material composed, made up, or manufactured, wholly or in part by the tailor, sempstress, or manufacturer."
By schedule D, a duty of twenty-five percent only is imposed on manufactures of silk, or of which silk shall be a component material, not otherwise provided for; manufactures of worsted, or of which worsted is a component material not otherwise provided for.
Shawls, whether worsted shawls, worsted and cotton shawls, silk and worsted shawls, barage shawls, merino shawls, silk shawls, worsted scarfs, silk scarfs, and mouseline de laine shawls, are wearing apparel, and therefore subject to a duty of thirty percent under schedule C.
The popular or received import of words furnishes the general rule for the interpretation of public laws as well as of private and social transactions.
It was an action brought by the plaintiffs in error against Lawrence, the collector of the port of New York, for a return of duties alleged to have been improperly exacted upon certain importations of shawls.
The circumstances of the case and the various prayers to the circuit court, both on behalf of the plaintiffs and defendant, are fully stated in the opinion of the Court.
