SALMON FALLS MANUFACTURING COMPANY V. GODDARD, 55 U. S. 446 (1852)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 55 U. S. 446
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/55/446/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/55/446/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Salmon Falls Manufacturing Company v. Goddard, 55 U.S. 14 How. 446 446 (1852)
Salmon Falls Manufacturing Company v. Goddard
55 U.S. (14 How.) 446
Syllabus
The statute of frauds in Massachusetts is substantially the same as that of 29 Car. 2, and declares that no contract for the sale of goods &c., shall be valid &c.,
"unless
some note or memorandum in writing of the bargain be made and signed by the party to be charged thereby or by some person thereunto by him lawfully authorized."
The following memorandum, viz.:
Sept. 19 -- W. W. Goddard, 12 mos.
300 bales S.F. drills . . . . . . . . . 7 1/4
100 cases blue do. . . . . . . . . . . 8 3/4
Credit to commence when ship sails:
not after Dec. 1st -- delivered free
of charge for truckage.
The blues, if color satisfactory to
purchasers.
R. M. M.
W. W. G.
-- is sufficient to take the case out of the statute.
If the terms are technical or equivocal on the face of the instrument, or made so by reference to extraneous circumstances, parol evidence of the usage and practice in the trade, is admissible to explain the meaning.
It was competent also to refer to the bill of parcels delivered for the purpose of explanation. It was made out and delivered by the seller, in the course of the fulfillment of the contract, acquiesced in by the buyer, and the goods ordered to be delivered after it was received.
The facts are set forth in the opinion of the Court, and also the rulings of the circuit court. The bill of exceptions extended over thirty pages of the printed record.