TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. v. FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, 485 U.S. 175 (1988)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC. v. FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, 485 U.S. 175
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/485/175/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/485/175/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. v. FLIGHT ATTENDANTS, 485 U.S. 175 (1988)
485 U.S. 175TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. v. INDEPENDENT FEDERATION OF FLIGHT ATTENDANTS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 86-1650.
Argued January 12, 1988
Decided March 2, 1988
809 F.2d 483, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Murray Gartner argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Paul E. Donnelly, Mark A. Buckstein, and Michael A. Katz.
Steven A. Fehr argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William A. Jolley, Doyle R. Pryor, and Scott A. Raisher.*
[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Crossover Flight Attendants by Mark P. Johnson; and for Some Working TWA Flight Attendants by Robert F. Gore, Rossie D. Alston, Jr., and Rex H. Reed.
Marsha Berzon, William Mahoney, John Clarke, Jr., and Laurence Gold filed a brief for the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE KENNEDY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.