Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/459/1313/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/459/1313/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Bonura v. CBS, Inc., 459 U.S. 1313 (1983)
Bonura v. CBS, Inc.
No. A-622
Decided January 16, 1983
459 U.S. 1313
ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY
Syllabus
An application to vacate the Court of Appeals' stay of the District Court's order forbidding the broadcast by CBS in the Dallas area of a particular segment of a designated program, is denied.
JUSTICE WHITE, Circuit Justice.
There is no doubt that, as Circuit Justice, I have the power to set aside the stay issued by the Court of Appeals in this case. Only the weightiest considerations, however, would warrant such action by a Circuit Justice. New York v. Kleppe, 429 U.S. 1307, 1310 (1976) (MARSHALL, J., in chambers); O'Rourke v. Levine, 80 S.Ct. 623, 624, 4 L.Ed.2d 615, 616 (1960) (Harlan, J., in chambers).
I have examined the transcript of the hearing held by the District Judge at 8:30 p.m. on January 15, 1983, in New Orleans, the order issued after the hearing forbidding the broadcast by CBS in the Dallas area of a particular segment of a designated program, the order issued by a divided panel of the Court of Appeals staying the District Court's order, and the application to me to vacate the stay of the Court of Appeals. I am not myself convinced that the Court of Appeals was in error in issuing the stay; and I do not think that, if the application were before the full Court, five Justices would vote to vacate the stay. Accordingly, I deny the application to vacate the stay.
