GARDNER V. WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO., 437 U. S. 478 (1978)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 437 U. S. 478
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/437/478/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/437/478/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co., 437 U.S. 478 (1978)
Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.
No. 77-560
Argued March 22, 1978
Decided June 21, 1978
437 U.S. 478
Syllabus
Petitioner, who had been denied employment by respondent's radio station, brought an action seeking injunctive relief against respondent on behalf of herself and other females adversely affected by respondent's alleged practice of discriminating against women. The District Court denied petitioner's motion for class certification under Fed.Rule Civ.Proc. 23(b). Claiming that, since the relief that could be granted in favor of the class would be broader than the relief she might obtain as an individual, the denial of class certification in effect refused a substantial portion of the injunctive relief sought, petitioner immediately appealed under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), which gives courts of appeals jurisdiction of appeals from interlocutory orders refusing injunctions, but the Court of Appeals held that it had no jurisdiction.
Held: The order denying class certification was not appealable under § 1292(a)(1).
Pp. 437 U. S. 480-482. 559 F.2d 209, affirmed.
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.