Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/411/618/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/411/618/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Gaca v. United States, 411 U.S. 618 (1973)
Gaca v. United States
No. 72-6011
Decided May 7, 1973
411 U.S. 618
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Reinstatement, unopposed by Solicitor General, of in forma pauperis appeal that had been dismissed for failure to pay filing fee, directed in exercise of Court's supervisory powers.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner was convicted in United States District Court of illegal wiretapping under 18 U.S.C. § 2511. His appeal was dismissed for want of timely prosecution when he failed to pay a $25 filing fee. Petitioner contends that he thought payment of the fee unnecessary because he had been granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis by the District Judge.
In his memorandum before this Court, the Solicitor General states that the United States does not oppose a remand to reinstate the appeal in the exercise of this Court's supervisory powers in order to avoid possible injustice and the possibility of collateral attack upon the conviction. In light of this representation, and upon our independent examination of the record, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for certiorari are granted, and the case is vacated and remanded with instructions that the appeal be reinstated.
It is so ordered.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST dissent.
