WEINTRAUB v. U.S, 400 U.S. 1014 (1971)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 400 U.S. 1014
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/400/1014/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/400/1014/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
WEINTRAUB v. U.S , 400 U.S. 1014 (1971)
400 U.S. 1014 Mark WEINTRAUB, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 5961.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 18, 1971
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Denied.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.
I dissent from a denial of certiorari in this case.
The Selective Service Regulations1 provide the sequence in which registrants shall be ordered to report for induction. Petitioner was in the group of nonvolunteers who are to be inducted 'in the order of their dates of birth with the oldest being selected first.'2
It seems clear that the order of call provisions are mandatory and that the local board's failure to observe them is a defense to an indictment. [Footnote 3] On the trial of
petitioner for failure to submit to induction, his counsel proffered evidence that some 18 registrants older than this petitioner and classified as I-A were available for in- [400 U.S. 1014 , 1016]
Full Text of Opinion