NEW YORK FEED CO., INC., v. LEARY, 397 U.S. 98 (1970)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC., v. LEARY, 397 U.S. 98
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/397/98/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/397/98/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
NEW YORK FEED CO., INC., v. LEARY, 397 U.S. 98 (1970)
397 U.S. 98 NEW YORK FEED CO., INC., ET AL. v. LEARY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK No. 992.
Decided February 27, 1970*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 998, Milky Way Productions, Inc., et al. v. Leary et al., also on appeal from the same court.
305 F. Supp. 288, affirmed.
Herald Price Fahringer for appellants in No. 992. Ralph J. Schwarz, Jr., and Albert B. Gerber for appellants in No. 998.
J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee Leary in both cases, and Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for appellee Hogan in both cases. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, filed a motion to dismiss or affirm for the Attorney General of New York.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.