ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., 397 U.S. 820 (1970)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC., 397 U.S. 820
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/397/820/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/397/820/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
ROCKEFELLER v. CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC. , 397 U.S. 820 (1970)
397 U.S. 820
Nelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al.
v.
CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER OF BROOKLYN & QUEENS, INC., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, et al.
No. 1379.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 4, 1970
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and George D. Zuckerman and Lloyd G. Milliken, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.
James M. Hartman and Richard L. Epstein, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253. See Goldstein v. Cox, 396 U.S. 471. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh decree from which timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 407.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS concurs in the result.[ Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 397 U.S. 820 (1970) ]