WYMAN v. BOWENS, 397 U.S. 49 (1970)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 397 U.S. 49
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/397/49/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/397/49/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
WYMAN v. BOWENS, 397 U.S. 49 (1970)
397 U.S. 49 WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK v. BOWENS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR
THE NORTHERN DISTRICT AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK No. 866.
Decided February 24, 1970*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 874, Lascaris, Commissioner of Onondaga County Department of Social Services v. Bowens et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
304 F. Supp. 717, affirmed.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant in No. 866. Leonard C. Koldin for appellant in No. 874.
Sydney M. Spector and Richard A. Ellison for appellees in both cases.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969).
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE BLACK, and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.