IN RE REED, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 396 U.S. 274
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/396/274/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/396/274/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
IN RE REED, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)
396 U.S. 274 IN RE REED
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE
No. 706.
Decided January 12, 1970
___ Del. ___, 257 A. 2d 382, appeal dismissed.
Warren B. Burt for appellant.
David P. Buckson, Attorney General, and Ruth M. Ferrell, State Solicitor, for the State of Delaware.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 274 (1970)
396 U.S. 274 LYON v. FLOURNOY, CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 715.
Decided January 12, 1970
271 Cal. App. 2d 774, 76 Cal. Rptr. 869, appeal dismissed.
Randal F. Dickey, Jr., and Robert L. McCarty for appellant.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Harold B. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, and William J. Power, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.