WOODS v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 320 (1969)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

WOODS v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 320 (1969) 394 U.S. 320

WOODS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR
COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 1006.
Decided March 24, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


394 U.S. 320 (1969) 394 U.S. 320 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOEING CO. v. HAMM, 394 U.S. 320 (1969) 394 U.S. 320


Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

WOODS v. CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 320 (1969) 394 U.S. 320 WOODS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR
COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 1006.
Decided March 24, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Burton Marks for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


394 U.S. 320 (1969) 394 U.S. 320 (1969) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOEING CO. v. HAMM, 394 U.S. 320 (1969) 394 U.S. 320 BOEING CO. v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 1017.
Decided March 24, 1969.

283 Ala. 310, 216 So. 2d 288, appeal dismissed.

John Bingham for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and William H. Burton, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 394 U.S. 320, 321