WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC. v. SUMMERFORD, 393 U.S. 9
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/9/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/9/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
WHITNEY STORES, INC. v. SUMMERFORD, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)
393 U.S. 9 WHITNEY STORES, INC., ET AL. v. SUMMERFORD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 85.
Decided October 14, 1968.
280 F. Supp. 406, affirmed.
E. N. Zeigler for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
HORNBEAK v. HAMM, 393 U.S. 9 (1968)
393 U.S. 9 HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA. No. 260.
Decided October 14, 1968.
283 F. Supp. 549, affirmed.
Barry Hess for appellant.
MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and Herbert I. Burson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWARD are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.