KOHLER v. TUGWELL, 393 U.S. 531 (1969)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 393 U.S. 531
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/531/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/531/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
KOHLER v. TUGWELL, 393 U.S. 531 (1969)
393 U.S. 531 KOHLER ET AL. v. TUGWELL, TREASURER OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 933.
Decided February 24, 1969.
292 F. Supp. 978, affirmed.
Donald V. Organ for appellants.
Dorothy Wolbrette and William P. Curry, Assistant Attorneys General of Louisiana, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, 393 U.S. 531 (1969)
393 U.S. 531 MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, SHERIFF, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 81, Misc.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers, Lonny F. Zwiener, and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Texas for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374.