PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, v. U.S., 393 U.S. 480 (1969)
Subscribe to Cases that cite v. U.S., 393 U.S. 480
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/480/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/480/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, v. U.S., 393 U.S. 480 (1969)
393 U.S. 480PROVISION SALESMEN & DISTRIBUTORS UNION, LOCAL 627, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS
& BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 790.
Decided January 27, 1969.
282 F. Supp. 819, affirmed.
Louis Waldman and Seymour M. Waldman for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington, 381 U.S. 657; American Federation of Musicians v. Carroll, 391 U.S. 99; and Los Angeles Meat Drivers Union v. United States, 371 U.S. 94.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.