STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP v. UNITED FRUIT, 393 U.S. 406 (1969)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 393 U.S. 406
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/406/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/406/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP v. UNITED FRUIT, 393 U.S. 406 (1969)
393 U.S. 406 STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CO. v. UNITED FRUIT CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 740.
Decided January 20, 1969.
Appeal dismissed.
Eberhard P. Deutsch, Robert M. Moore, and Rene H. Himel, Jr., for appellant.
Hugh B. Cox and James H. McGlothlin for United Fruit Co., and Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Shenandoah Valley Broadcasting, Inc. v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers, 375 U.S. 39.
U.S. Supreme Court
PHILLIPS v. ROCKEFELLER, 393 U.S. 406 (1969)
393 U.S. 406 PHILLIPS ET AL. v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 854.
Decided January 20, 1969.
292 F. Supp. 851, affirmed.
Robert L. Bobrick for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.