WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/319/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/319/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, 393 U.S. 319 (1969)
393 U.S. 319 WILLIAMS & CO., INC. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 706.
Decided January 13, 1969.
430 Pa. 509, 244 A. 2d 37, appeal dismissed.
Norman J. Cowie for appellant.
Robert E. Dauer for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
COX v. UNITED STATES, 393 U.S. 319 (1969)
393 U.S. 319 COX ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 708.
Decided January 13, 1969.
Affirmed.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.