ROSSO v. PUERTO RICO, 393 U.S. 14 (1968)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 393 U.S. 14
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/14/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/393/14/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
ROSSO v. PUERTO RICO, 393 U.S. 14 (1968)
393 U.S. 14 ROSSO ET UX. v. PUERTO RICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO.
No. 242.
Decided October 14, 1968.
___ P. R. R. ___, appeal dismissed.
Walter L. Newsom, Jr., and James B. Donovan for appellants.
Rafael A. Rivera-Cruz, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, J. F. Rodriguez-Rivera, Deputy Solicitor General, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ROBERTS, JUDGE v. POLLARD, 393 U.S. 14 (1968)
393 U.S. 14 ROBERTS, JUDGE, ET AL. v. POLLARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 251.
Decided October 14, 1968.
283 F. Supp. 248, affirmed.
Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.