Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/391/461/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/391/461/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
WORLD AIRWAYS v. PAN AMERICAN, 391 U.S. 461 (1968)
391 U.S. 461 WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL. v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
No. 800.
Argued April 29-30, 1968.
Decided May 27, 1968.*
380 F.2d 770, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 946, Civil Aeronautics Board v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al., and No. 969, American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
Assistant Attorney General Wozencraft argued the cause for petitioner in No. 946. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Joseph B. Goldman, O. D. Ozment, Warren L. Sharfman, and Robert L. Toomey. Jerrold Scoutt, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners in Nos. 800 and 969. With him on the brief for petitioners in No. 800 were Leonard N. Bebchick, George Berkowitz, Stephen D. Potts, Clayton L. Burwell, and Frederick Bernays Wiener. Charles A. Hobbs and Glen A. Wilkinson filed briefs for petitioner in No. 969.
Edward R. Neaher argued the cause for respondents in all cases. With him on the brief were Carl S. Rowe and Gertrude S. Rosenthal.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
