Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/390/457/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/390/457/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968)
390 U.S. 457 REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.
278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.
Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968)
390 U.S. 457 ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
