Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/390/204/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/390/204/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 204 (1968)
390 U.S. 204 ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 965, Misc.
Decided March 4, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
STONE v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 204 (1968)
390 U.S. 204 STONE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 9.
Decided March 4, 1968.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 14, Conti et al. v. United States; No. 77, Ross v. United States; No. 121, Donlon v. United States; No. 798, Angelini v. United States; and No. 1024, Pizzarello v. United States, all on petitions for writs of certiorari. No. 77 is to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Nos. 14 and 1024 to the Second Circuit, No. 121 to the Third Circuit, and No. 798 to the Seventh Circuit.
Certiorari granted; No. 9, 357 F.2d 257; No. 14, 361 F.2d 153; No. 77, 374 F.2d 227; No. 121, 370 F.2d 987; No. 798, 379 F.2d 946; and No. 1024, 386 F.2d 177, vacated and remanded.
Charles W. Tessmer and Emmett Colvin, Jr., for petitioner in No. 9. William T. Griffin for petitioners in No. 14. Seymour Samuels, Jr., and William R. Willis, Jr., for petitioner in No. 77. Anna R. Lavin and Richard E. Gorman for petitioner in No. 798. James G. Starkey for petitioner in No. 1024.
Former Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in No. 9. Former Solicitor General Marshall,
Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States in No. 14. Former Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States in No. 77. Former Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States in No. 121. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Miss Rosenberg for the United States in No. 798. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States in No. 1024.
PER CURIAM.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments of the courts below are vacated and the cases are remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39, and Grosso v. United States, ante, p. 62.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of Nos. 9, 14, 77, and 121. [390 U.S. 204, 206]
Full Text of Opinion
