MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 968 (1967)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 389 U.S. 968
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/968/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/968/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. CALIFORNIA , 389 U.S. 968 (1967)
389 U.S. 968
Lucille MILLER, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 154.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 4, 1967
F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
- '1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel and against self- incrimination.
- '2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute harmless error.'
The case is placed on the summary calendar.[ Miller v. California 389 U.S. 968 (1967) ]
Full Text of Opinion