CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 89 (1967)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 389 U.S. 89
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/89/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/89/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 89 (1967)
389 U.S. 89 CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. No. 306, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1967.
Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.
Marshall W. Krause for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Michael J. Phelan, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.