I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO, 389 U.S. 573 (1968)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 389 U.S. 573
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/573/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/573/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO, 389 U.S. 573 (1968)
389 U.S. 573 I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 260.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Reversed.
Allen Brown for appellant.
Melvin G. Rueger and Calvin W. Prem for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE concurs on the ground that evidence of contemporary community standards was excluded at trial.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.
U.S. Supreme Court
BAXTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 389 U.S. 573 (1968)
389 U.S. 573 BAXTER ET AL. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 858.
Decided January 15, 1968.
426 Pa. 240, 231 A. 2d 151, appeal dismissed.
Jacob J. Kilimnik for appellants.
Frank J. Pfizenmayer and Levy Anderson for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.