RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 389 U.S. 570
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/570/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/570/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)
389 U.S. 570 RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 879.
Decided January 15, 1968.
274 F. Supp. 200, affirmed.
Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., pro se, and Jerry Dee Moize for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Jack H. Weiner for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
DINIS v. VOLPE, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)
389 U.S. 570 DINIS ET AL. v. VOLPE, GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 882.
Decided January 15, 1968.
264 F. Supp. 425, affirmed.
Edmund Dinis, pro se, for other appellants.
Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, and Mark L. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.