STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE., 389 U.S. 1026 (1968)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 389 U.S. 1026
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/1026/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/389/1026/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
STATE OF ARKANSAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE. , 389 U.S. 1026 (1968)
389 U.S. 1026
STATE OF ARKANSAS, plaintiff,
v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE.
No. 33, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 15, 1968
Joe Purcell, Atty. Gen. of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the motion.
George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen. of Tennessee, C. Hayes Cooney, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Harry W. Laughlin, James L. Garthright, Jr., and J. Martin Regan, Special Counsel, for defendant.
The motion for leave to file the bill of complaint is granted and the State of Tennessee is allowed sixty days to answer.
It is ordered that the Honorable Gunnar H. Nordbye, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.
The master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.
It is further ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, the Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.[ State of Arkansas v. State of Tennessee. 389 U.S. 1026 (1968) ]