Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/387/425/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/387/425/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. COLON, 387 U.S. 425 (1967)
387 U.S. 425 CEPERO v. COLON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO.
No. 1606, Misc.
Decided May 29, 1967.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
MARKIS v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 425 (1967)
387 U.S. 425 MARKIS v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 43.
Decided May 29, 1967.*
Certiorari granted; No. 43, 352 F.2d 860, No. 64, 353 F.2d 672, vacated and remanded.
[Footnote *] Together with No. 64, Moretti v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.
Alfred Belinkie for petitioner in No. 43. W. Paul Flynn for petitioner in No. 64.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States in No. 43. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in No. 64.
PER CURIAM.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments vacated and the cases remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut for a new trial, should the Government seek to prosecute petitioners anew. Nardone v. United States, 302 U.S. 379; Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338.
