NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB, 385 U.S. 453 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB, 385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 758.
Decided January 9, 1967.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453 (1967) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ROOSEVELT RACEWAY v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, 385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. COUNTY OF NASSAU ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 732.
Decided January 9, 1967.
18 N.Y.2d 30, 218 N.E.2d 539, appeal dismissed.
George Morton Levy for appellant.
Morris H. Schneider for the County of Nassau et al.; Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of New York, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB, 385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453 NEHRING v. CITY OF DeKALB ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 758.
Decided January 9, 1967.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 385 U.S. 453, 454
385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453 (1967) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
ROOSEVELT RACEWAY v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, 385 U.S. 453 (1967) 385 U.S. 453 ROOSEVELT RACEWAY, INC. v. COUNTY OF NASSAU ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 732.
Decided January 9, 1967.
18 N.Y.2d 30, 218 N.E.2d 539, appeal dismissed. George Morton Levy for appellant. Morris H. Schneider for the County of Nassau et al.; Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for the Attorney General of New York, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
