GUY v. TAHASH, 385 U.S. 12 (1966)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 385 U.S. 12
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/385/12/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/385/12/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
GUY v. TAHASH, 385 U.S. 12 (1966)
385 U.S. 12 GUY v. TAHASH, WARDEN, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 169, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
BOOKCASE, INC. v. LEARY, 385 U.S. 12 (1966)
385 U.S. 12 BOOKCASE, INC., ET AL. v. LEARY, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE
CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 332.
Decided October 10, 1966.
18 N. Y. 2d 71, 218 N. E. 2d 668, appeal dismissed.
Emanuel Redfield and Benjamin E. Winston for appellants.
J. Lee Rankin and Frank S. Hogan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.