Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/383/102/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/383/102/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 102 (1966)
383 U.S. 102 McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. No. 1036, Misc.
Decided February 21, 1966.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 102 (1966)
383 U.S. 102 LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
KENTUCKY. No. 792.
Decided February 21, 1966.
244 F. Supp. 337, affirmed.
H. G. Breetz, W. L. Grubbs, M. D. Jones and Joseph L. Lenihan for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., and Robert E. Hogan for appellee Railway Labor Executives' Association.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
