RICHMOND TELEVISION CORP. V. UNITED STATES, 382 U. S. 68 (1965)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 382 U. S. 68
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/68/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/68/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Richmond Television Corp. v. United States, 382 U.S. 68 (1965)
Richmond Television Corp. v. United States
No. 420
Decided November 8, 1965
382 U.S. 68
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Certiorari granted; 345 F.2d 901 vacated and remanded.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General and an independent examination of the record, we believe that the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was mistaken in its view that petitioner's amortization claims for the taxable years 1956 and 1957 were not properly before it. Although the record is not free from ambiguity, we take the Court of Appeals to have based its decision on the ground that the petitioner's amortization claims derived solely from net operating loss deductions carried forward from prior years, and that no additional amortization deductions for 1956 and 1957 were sought. Since we find that the petitioner adequately presented its amortization claims for 1956 and 1957, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court for the consideration of those claims, without intimation of any kind as to their merit.