ODELL v. STATE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WELFARE OF WISCONSIN, 382 U.S. 420 (1966)
Subscribe to Cases that cite PUBLIC WELFARE OF WISCONSIN, 382 U.S. 420
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/420/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/420/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
ODELL v. STATE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WELFARE OF WISCONSIN, 382 U.S. 420 (1966)
382 U.S. 420 ODELL v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF WISCONSIN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
WISCONSIN. No. 896, Misc.
Decided January 24, 1966.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
BANKS v. CALIFORNIA, 382 U.S. 420 (1966)
382 U.S. 420 BANKS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 87, Misc.
Decided January 24, 1966.
Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, for further proceedings in light of Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration of this motion and petition.