Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/366/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/382/366/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
LLOYD v. BRICK, 382 U.S. 366 (1966)
382 U.S. 366 LLOYD v. BRICK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 679.
Decided January 17, 1966.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
INTERNATIONAL UNION, ELEC., RADIO v. NAT'L LABOR REL., 382 U.S. 366 (1966)
382 U.S. 366 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 87.
Decided January 17, 1966.
Certiorari granted; judgments vacated and remanded.
Irving Abramson, Benjamin C. Sigal and Winn I. Newman for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Laurence S. Gold for National Labor Relations Board, and David L. Benetar and Sanford Browde for General Electric Co., respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Automobile Workers v. Scofield, ante, p. 205.
