CORPORA v. NEW YORK, 380 U.S. 520 (1965)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 380 U.S. 520
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/380/520/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/380/520/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
CORPORA v. NEW YORK, 380 U.S. 520 (1965)
380 U.S. 520 CORPORA v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 934.
Decided April 26, 1965.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Emanuel Redfield for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
GOLD v. DiCARLO, 380 U.S. 520 (1965)
380 U.S. 520 GOLD ET AL. v. DiCARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 901.
Decided April 26, 1965.
235 F. Supp. 817, affirmed.
Jesse Moss for appellants.
Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.