TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 379 U.S. 19
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/379/19/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/379/19/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
TANCIL v. WOOLLS, 379 U.S. 19 (1964)
379 U.S. 19 TANCIL ET AL. v. WOOLLS ET AL., JUDGES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA. No. 386.
Decided October 26, 1964.*
[Footnote *] Together with No. 412, Virginia Board of Elections et al. v. Hamm et al., also on appeal from the same court.
230 F. Supp. 156, affirmed.
Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants in No. 386 and for appellees in No. 412.
Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Assistant Attorney General, William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk for appellants in No. 412.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment in both cases is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in both cases.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.