Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/376/188/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/376/188/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
KOTEK v. BENNETT, 376 U.S. 188 (1964)
376 U.S. 188 KOTEK v. BENNETT, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 908, Misc.
Decided February 17, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 255 Iowa 984, 124 N. W. 2d 710.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
ROGERS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 188 (1964)
376 U.S. 188 ROGERS v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 412, Misc.
Decided February 17, 1964.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 313 F.2d 425.
John D. Spellman for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon consideration of the entire record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reconsider the conviction on count nine in light of the Government's confession of error and to determine whether the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed on the basis of the conviction under count seven.
