SHUTTLESWORTH V. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, 373 U. S. 262 (1963)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 373 U. S. 262
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/373/262/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/373/262/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262 (1963)
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
No. 67
Argued November 6-7, 1962
Decided May 20, 1963
373 U.S. 262
Syllabus
Petitioners, two Negro ministers, were convicted in an Alabama State Court of aiding and abetting a violation of a criminal trespass ordinance of Birmingham, Ala. The only evidence against them was to the effect that they had incited ten Negro students to engage in a "sit-down demonstration" at a white lunch counter as a protest against racial segregation. In Gober v. City of Birmingham, post, p. 374, this Court today holds, on the authority of Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 373 U. S. 214, that the convictions of those ten students for criminal trespass were constitutionally invalid.
Held: since those convictions have been set aside, it follows that these petitioners did not incite or aid and abet any crime, and that, therefore, the convictions of these petitioners must also be set aside.
Pp. 373 U. S. 263-266.
41 Ala. App. 318, 319, 134 So. 2d 213, 215, reversed.