RUDNICKI v. COX, 372 U.S. 226 (1963)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 372 U.S. 226
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/372/226/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/372/226/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
RUDNICKI v. COX, 372 U.S. 226 (1963)
372 U.S. 226 RUDNICKI v. COX ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 706.
Decided February 18, 1963.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
BOARD CTY. COMM'RS, JEFFERSON v. CITY & CTY., DENVER, 372 U.S. 226 (1963)
372 U.S. 226 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, ET AL. v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO. No. 635.
Decided February 18, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 150 Colo. 198, 372 P.2d 152.
Charles Ginsberg for appellants.
Robert S. Wham, Richard P. Matsch, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.