STUART v. WILSON, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 371 U.S. 576
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/371/576/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/371/576/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
STUART v. WILSON, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)
371 U.S. 576 STUART ET AL. v. WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 543.
Decided January 21, 1963.
211 F. Supp. 700, affirmed.
James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Tom I. McFarling, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
BARDY v. UNITED STATES, 371 U.S. 576 (1963)
371 U.S. 576 BARDY v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 603.
Decided January 21, 1963.
Appeal dismissed.
Morton R. Galane for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel and Irwin A. Seibel for the United States, and Albert C. Bickford for MCA Inc., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed.