Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/371/392/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/371/392/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
Cleary v. Bolger, 371 U.S. 392 (1963)
Cleary v. Bolger
No. 57
Argued November 14-15, 1962
Decided January 14,1963
371 U.S. 392
Syllabus
While a state criminal prosecution and a state administrative proceeding for revocation of his license were pending against respondent, he brought this suit in a Federal District Court to enjoin a state officer and certain federal officers from testifying in either proceeding about incriminating statements elicited from respondent while he was being illegally detained and interrogated by the federal officers. The state officer had been present during part of the interrogation, but had not participated therein. Finding that the incriminating statements had been procured by the federal officers in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(a), the Court granted the injunction against them and the state officer. Only the state officer sought review in this Court.
Held: the injunction against the state officer was improvidently granted. Stefanelli v. Minard, 342 U. S. 117, followed. Rea v. United States, 350 U. S. 214, distinguished. Pp. 371 U. S. 392-401.
293 F.2d 368 reversed.
