UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 371 U.S. 21
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/371/21/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/371/21/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)
371 U.S. 21 UNITED STATES ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 235.
Decided October 15, 1962.
202 F. Supp. 757, affirmed.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz and William Massar for the United States.
John H. Caruthers for Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., v. HURD, ADMINISTRATOR, 371 U.S. 21 (1962)
371 U.S. 21 SOUTHEASTERN AVIATION, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS SOUTHEAST AIRLINES,
v. HURD. ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 286.
Decided October 15, 1962.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 209 Tenn. 639, 355 S. W. 2d 436.
Russell R. Kramer and Erma Griffith Greenwood for appellant.
Howard E. Wilson and Preston H. Taylor for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.