SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., 368 U.S. 813 (1961)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., 368 U.S. 813
Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/368/813/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/368/813/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. , 368 U.S. 813 (1961)
368 U.S. 813
SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., et al., petitioners,
v.
WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. et al.
No. 241.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1961
Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin, for petitioners.
William C. Dixon, for respondents.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
- '1. Where a group of citrus fruit growers form a cooperative organization for the purpose of collectively processing and marketing their fruit, and carry out those functions through the agency of three co-operative agricultural associations, each of which is basically wholly owned and governed by those growers, and each of which is admittedly entitled to the exemption from the antitrust laws accorded to agricultural cooperatives by the Capper-Volstead Act (7 U. S.C.A., sec. 291)-is an unlawful conspiracy, combination or agreement established under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C.A. 1, 2] upon proof only that these growers, through the agency of these three cooperatives, agreed among only themselves with respect to the extent of the division of the function of processing between them or with respect to the price they would charge in the open market for the fruit and the by-products thereof processed and marketed by them?'
The case is transferred to the summary calendar.[ Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. 368 U.S. 813 (1961) ]
Full Text of Opinion