Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
USA Constitution Annotated
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Online Case Law
Cornell LII
FastCase $
Lexis $
LexisOne
Loislaw $
USSCPlus.com $
VersusLaw $
Link to the Case Preview: http://supreme.justia.com/us/365/299/
Link to the Full Text of Case: http://supreme.justia.com/us/365/299/case.html
U.S. Supreme Court
SNYDER v. TOWN OF NEWTOWN, 365 U.S. 299 (1961)
365 U.S. 299 SNYDER ET AL. v. TOWN OF NEWTOWN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 580.
Decided February 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 147 Conn. 374, 161 A. 2d 770.
Philip Reich for appellants.
James J. O'Connell and Albert L. Coles for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
CORDAK v. REUBEN H. DONNELLEY CORP., 365 U.S. 299 (1961)
365 U.S. 299CORDAK, DOING BUSINESS AS A. B. DENTAL PLATE LABORATORY, ET AL. v. REUBEN
H. DONNELLEY CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 582.
Decided February 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 20 Ill. 2d 153, 169 N. E. 2d 321.
John Paul Stevens for appellants.
Owen Rall for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
